Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Spring 2-21-2026
Abstract
Human Resources, particularly in the Appalachian region, have several ethical dilemmas in their line of work. With the minuscule number of companies in this area, companies often utilize stakeholders in the company to serve as Human Resources (HR) in that same company. This paper examines the ethical responsibility of companies to implement checks and balances by using Human resources for their intended role of ethical upholding within companies. Examining this perspective through the Utilitarianism ethical theory, which emphasizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Despite the argument for a stakeholder having faster decision- making in HR actions. As well as a stakeholder having more knowledge of the company and an overall deeper understanding of the business. Contrasting Milton Friedman’s shareholder theory, which promotes profit over social responsibility. Consequently, the paper affirms that looking through a Utilitarian lens not only aligns with ethical business practices but also enhances long- term business by gaining the trust of employees, having safeguards in cases of ethical dilemmas, and unbiased decision-making. Ultimately, the greatest good for the greatest amount of people ensures a long-lasting company culture and community support, ensuring the business’s success.
Course Level
BUMG 6100: Regulation and Ethics in Business
Advisor
Claudia Hanrahan, PhD
Recommended Citation
Morgensen, Gracelyn R.; Meade, Craigery S.; and Bittner, Olyvia L., "Conflict of Interest in Human Resources - The Stakeholder Dilemma" (2026). Business Ethics. 25.
https://digitalcommons.shawnee.edu/business_ethics_3100/25
Included in
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Human Resources Management Commons