Viewing Dialect as a Celebration of Culture and Communication in Appalachia

University

Shawnee State University

Major

Early Childhood Education

Student Type

Undergraduate Student

Presentation Types

Poster Presentation

Keywords:

Non-standard dialect, monophthongization, diphthongs, inanimate agents

Abstract

The paper explores the northern Kentucky variety of the Appalachian dialect spoken in the South Shore area of Kentucky in terms of its grammatical system such as phonetics/phonology, morphology, syntax, pragmatics, and vocabulary. The empirical data was collected in the natural environment with the two speakers of the dialect with all characteristic features that distinguish this variety from the Standard dialect of American English. The research confirms the earlier hypotheses that non-standard dialects are rule-governed the same way as the standard. The results also show that the pedagogical approach to the non-standard dialects should be modified in schools and instead of the Deficit Approach teachers should exercise the so called Difference Approach in teaching children speaking non-standard. The important outcome of such teaching is that the different dialects will be retained and facilitated as part of local identity and culture.

Human Subjects

yes

IRB Approval

yes

Faculty Mentor Name

Leila Lomashvili

Faculty Mentor Academic Department

English and Humanities

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Viewing Dialect as a Celebration of Culture and Communication in Appalachia

The paper explores the northern Kentucky variety of the Appalachian dialect spoken in the South Shore area of Kentucky in terms of its grammatical system such as phonetics/phonology, morphology, syntax, pragmatics, and vocabulary. The empirical data was collected in the natural environment with the two speakers of the dialect with all characteristic features that distinguish this variety from the Standard dialect of American English. The research confirms the earlier hypotheses that non-standard dialects are rule-governed the same way as the standard. The results also show that the pedagogical approach to the non-standard dialects should be modified in schools and instead of the Deficit Approach teachers should exercise the so called Difference Approach in teaching children speaking non-standard. The important outcome of such teaching is that the different dialects will be retained and facilitated as part of local identity and culture.