Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Fall 2025
Abstract
This paper explains the ethical concerns of disability discrimination (ableism) in the workplace. Showing personal experience and witnessing others who are experiencing disability discrimination, the paper argues that individuals with disabilities continue to face unfair treatment, limited opportunities, and little to no accommodations, even with legal protections in place, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Through data, ethical theory frameworks, and real-world examples, this paper explains how ableism persists in hiring processes and workplace requirements, which are justified under the fiduciary theory framework. Using the utilitarianism theory, we argue that expanding accommodations, improving accessibility, and promoting inclusive hiring processes create the greatest good for the greatest number of the population by benefiting not only disabled individuals but also businesses that are willing to adapt and hire them as well as other employees who may be picking up extra slack from low employment rate. The paper concludes that organizations have a moral and social responsibility to uphold unbiased standards, challenge traditional stigmas, and provide accommodations to enhance opportunities and promote ethical leadership for individuals with disabilities.
Advisor
Claudia Hanrahan, PhD
Recommended Citation
Rodgers, Abbigail s.; Parnin, Jace N.; and Dennis, Zackary C., "Ending Ableism: Discrimination in the Workplace" (2025). Business Ethics. 23.
https://digitalcommons.shawnee.edu/business_ethics_3100/23